Botsford v. Howell

52 Cal. 158
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1877·No. No. 8473·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

The plaintiff, in his application to purchase the lands, stated, that “ he did not know of any valid claim to the same other than his own, and that there were no settlers thereon, or, if there were, that the land had been segregated more than six months.” The application does not conform to sec. 3442 of the Political Code. The facts required by that section to be stated in the application must be stated directly and positively, and not in an alternative form, as in this case.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Botsford v. Howell, 52 Cal. 158 (Cal. 1877).

52 Cal. 158 (Botsford v. Howell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barbree v. Kingsbury
119 P. 107 (California Court of Appeal, 1911)
Moran v. Bonynge
107 P. 312 (California Supreme Court, 1910)
Millidge v. Hyde
6 P. 852 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
McCoy v. Byrd
3 P. 121 (California Supreme Court, 1884)
Wilke v. Cohn
54 Cal. 212 (California Supreme Court, 1880)