Botsford v. Dodge

The Superior Court of New York City

Botsford v. Dodge

65 How. Pr. 145

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJune 15, 1883

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 65 How. Pr. 145 (Botsford v. Dodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Botsford v. Dodge, 65 How. Pr. 145 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Freedman, J.

Held, that an averment in a complaint of incorporation does not carry with it any allegation of the existence of any specific number of trustees, and although the law requires three or more trustees the court will not hold, without any specific allegation of the complaint, to that effect, that there existed any more trustees than are named in the "complaint; that the grounds of demurrer were not apparent on the face of the complaint, and the demurrers were overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedman, J.

Held, that an averment in a complaint of incorporation does not carry with it any allegation of the existence of any specific number of trustees, and although the law requires three or more trustees the court will not hold, without any specific allegation of the complaint, to that effect, that there existed any more trustees than are named in the "complaint; that the grounds of demurrer were not apparent on the face of the complaint, and the demurrers were overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 How. Pr. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/botsford-v-dodge-nysuperctnyc-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack