Botie v. Town of Babylon

71 Misc. 3d 128(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 50234(U)
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 18, 2021
Docket2019-1830 S C
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 Misc. 3d 128(A) (Botie v. Town of Babylon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Botie v. Town of Babylon, 71 Misc. 3d 128(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 50234(U) (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Botie v Town of Babylon (2021 NY Slip Op 50234(U)) [*1]

Botie v Town of Babylon
2021 NY Slip Op 50234(U) [71 Misc 3d 128(A)]
Decided on March 18, 2021
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on March 18, 2021
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : TERRY JANE RUDERMAN, P.J., JERRY GARGUILO, ELIZABETH H. EMERSON, JJ
2019-1830 S C

Philip Botie, Respondent,

against

Town of Babylon, Appellant.


Babylon Town Attorney (Eckor Joseph of counsel), for appellant. Philip Botie, respondent pro se.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Suffolk County, Third District (C. Stephen Hackeling, J.), entered June 27, 2019. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the action.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover the sum of $4,580.28 for defendant's failure to pay a judgment that plaintiff had obtained against it and for defendant's alleged malicious prosecution of a parking violation against plaintiff. Following a nonjury trial, the District Court dismissed the action. Defendant appeals.

As the action against defendant was dismissed, defendant is not aggrieved by the judgment and its appeal cannot lie (see CPLR 5511; Mixon v TBV, Inc., 76 AD3d 144, 156-157 [2010]). This is so even though defendant disagrees with particular findings supporting the judgment in its favor (see Pennsylvania Gen. Ins. Co. v Austin Powder Co., 68 NY2d 465, 472-473 [1986]; Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ. of City of NY, 60 NY2d 539, 545 [1983]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Dewar, 186 AD3d 826, 827 [2020]; Peoples Natl. Bank of Rockland County v Weiner, 100 AD2d 841, 841 [1984]).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

RUDERMAN, P.J., GARGUILO and EMERSON, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: March 18, 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pain Med., PLLC v. Tri State Consumer Ins. Co.
75 Misc. 3d 137(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 Misc. 3d 128(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 50234(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/botie-v-town-of-babylon-nyappterm-2021.