Bothwell v. Sheffield

8 Ga. 569
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1850·No. No. 98·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

We concur fully in the judgment of the Circuit Court, that the securities have a plain and adequate remedy at Common Law. Whenever, by previous recovery, the penalty of the Sheriff’s bond has been exhausted, they can plead this fact,' and protect themselves from further liability ; and this being the case, it would be unjust to the more vigilant suitors who have been aggrieved or injured by the official misconduct of the Sheriff, to restrain them from prosecuting their rights at law. Acts of 1847, p. 201.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bothwell v. Sheffield, 8 Ga. 569 (Ga. 1850).

8 Ga. 569 (Bothwell v. Sheffield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Witter v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
247 N.W. 831 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1933)
Arbie v. Jones
82 Ark. 414 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1907)
Lane v. Harris
16 Ga. 217 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1854)