Bothell v. Whitley Bros.

60 S.E. 371, 3 Ga. App. 755, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 423
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 24, 1908·No. 785·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The assignment of error is to a judgment denying a motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds, and is sufficient to reach the said grounds. The motion to dismiss is therefore denied. Rules of Court of Appeals, Rule 8.

. 2. The evidence showing that the plaintiff was the bona fide holder of the acceptances sued on, and that he had received them before maturity and without notice of any defect or defense, it was error to allow testimony in support of a plea of failure of consideration. Civil Code, §3694.

3. The holder of a negotiable instrument indorsed in blank is presumed to be such bona fide and for value. Habersham v. Lehman, 63 Ga. 380.

4. A verdict for the plaintiff was demanded, and a new trial should have been granted. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bothell v. Whitley Bros., 60 S.E. 371, 3 Ga. App. 755, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 423 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

60 S.E. 371 (Bothell v. Whitley Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitfield v. Cohutta Banking Co.
143 S.E. 787 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Ennis v. Coshocton National Bank
108 S.E. 811 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Youmans v. Puder
80 S.E. 34 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Simmons v. Council
63 S.E. 238 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)