Bothe v. Morris

146 S.W. 1184, 103 Ark. 370, 1912 Ark. LEXIS 185
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 29, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 146 S.W. 1184 (Bothe v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bothe v. Morris, 146 S.W. 1184, 103 Ark. 370, 1912 Ark. LEXIS 185 (Ark. 1912).

Opinions

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts). The verdict of the jury shows that they resolved the issue in favor of the appellant. Having found in favor of the appellant, the uncontradicted evidence shows that his damage was much more than the sum of one dollar. There is no evidence therefore to sustain the verdict in that sum. The jury were not authorized to disregard the undisputed testimony in fixing the amount of the damage. The court therefore should have granted the appellant a new trial. The case is ruled in this respect by Carroll v. Texarkana Gas & Electric Company, 102 Ark. 137.

The judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spring Creek Living Center v. Sarrett
890 S.W.2d 598 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)
McVay v. Cowger
635 S.W.2d 249 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1982)
Lynch v. East Arkansas Builders' Supply Company
104 S.W.2d 205 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1937)
Smith v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.
86 S.W.2d 411 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1935)
Fulbright v. Phipps
3 S.W.2d 49 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1928)
Krummen Motor Bus & Taxi Co. v. Mechanics' Lumber Co.
300 S.W. 389 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 S.W. 1184, 103 Ark. 370, 1912 Ark. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bothe-v-morris-ark-1912.