Both v. Hyatt

7 A.D.2d 992, 184 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9803

This text of 7 A.D.2d 992 (Both v. Hyatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Both v. Hyatt, 7 A.D.2d 992, 184 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

In an action by the vendee named in a contract for the purchase and sale of real property for specific performance, and for other relief, the appeal is (1) from an order dismissing the amended complaint on the motion of respondent Albert M. Hyatt,. by reason of appellant’s failure diligently to prosecute the action (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 156), and (2) from the decision on which said order was entered. The order recites that respondent Burchetta was heard as an attorney and as a party in support of the motion. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from decision dismissed, without costs. No appeal lies from a decision. Present ■—Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 A.D.2d 992, 184 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/both-v-hyatt-nyappdiv-1959.