Botek v. State
787 So. 2d 961, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8077, 2001 WL 649736
This text of 787 So. 2d 961 (Botek v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Botek v. State, 787 So. 2d 961, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8077, 2001 WL 649736 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Villavicencio v. State, 719 So.2d 322, 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (“Defense counsel cannot be held ineffective for failing to anticipate changes in the law.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Villavicencio v. State
719 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
787 So. 2d 961, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8077, 2001 WL 649736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/botek-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.