Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Botek v. State

Botek v. State

787 So. 2d 961, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8077, 2001 WL 649736
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 13, 2001·No. No. 3D01-1294·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Villavicencio v. State, 719 So.2d 322, 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (“Defense counsel cannot be held ineffective for failing to anticipate changes in the law.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Botek v. State, 787 So. 2d 961, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8077, 2001 WL 649736 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

787 So. 2d 961 (Botek v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Villavicencio v. State
719 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)