Botek v. State

787 So. 2d 961, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8077, 2001 WL 649736
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 2001
DocketNo. 3D01-1294
StatusPublished

This text of 787 So. 2d 961 (Botek v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Botek v. State, 787 So. 2d 961, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8077, 2001 WL 649736 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Villavicencio v. State, 719 So.2d 322, 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (“Defense counsel cannot be held ineffective for failing to anticipate changes in the law.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Villavicencio v. State
719 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
787 So. 2d 961, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8077, 2001 WL 649736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/botek-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.