Botarf v. State
867 So. 2d 1280, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 2004 WL 587655
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 26, 2004
DocketNo. 5D03-1072
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 867 So. 2d 1280 (Botarf v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Botarf v. State, 867 So. 2d 1280, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 2004 WL 587655 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
Based on the State’s concession of error, for which we commend it, the order finding Botarf in violation of his probation and the sentence imposed thereafter is reversed. On remand, the State may proceed on the original affidavit alleging that Botarf violated his probation, or may amend it. See Ray v. State, 855 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum
912 So. 2d 561 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Walker v. Bignell
301 N.W.2d 447 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1981)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
867 So. 2d 1280, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 2004 WL 587655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/botarf-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.