Boswer v. State

265 So. 2d 55
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 1972·No. No. 71-1380·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Arthur L. Boswer, was charged with grand larceny of four lengths of pipe. He was tried non-jury and found guilty as charged. The court imposed a sentence of eighteen months in the state penitentiary.

The defendant has appealed from the judgment of conviction and the sentence. Among the grounds relied upon for reversal is that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of all of the evidence. We find merit in the defendant’s contention and reverse.

After a careful review of the record on appeal, we are convinced that the evidence adduced by the state was not sufficient to measure up to that degree of proof which is required to establish guilt. The evidence here creates a strong suspicion of guilt, but a mere suspicion, no matter how great, does not warrant a conviction. Davis v. State, Fla.App.1968, 216 So.2d 28. Therefore, the judgment and sentence are reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boswer v. State, 265 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

265 So. 2d 55 (Boswer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight v. State
294 So. 2d 387 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)