Boswell v. Town of Electric

Alabama Court of Appeals

Boswell v. Town of Electric

95 So. 919, 19 Ala. App. 201, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 82

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 1923

Docket5 Div. 443.

StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 919 (Boswell v. Town of Electric) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boswell v. Town of Electric, 95 So. 919, 19 Ala. App. 201, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 82 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This defendant was convicted in the recorder’s court of the town, of Eclectic for a violation of one of the ordinances of said town. He appealed to the circuit court of the county, and was again convicted, and from this judgment he appeals to this court.

There are no assignments of error as required, nor has any brief been filed, in this court in behalf of appellant. This being a prerequisite to a consideration of the appeal by this court, the judgment appealed from must be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This defendant was convicted in the recorder’s court of the town, of Eclectic for a violation of one of the ordinances of said town. He appealed to the circuit court of the county, and was again convicted, and from this judgment he appeals to this court.

There are no assignments of error as required, nor has any brief been filed, in this court in behalf of appellant. This being a prerequisite to a consideration of the appeal by this court, the judgment appealed from must be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 So. 919, 19 Ala. App. 201, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boswell-v-town-of-electric-alactapp-1923.