Boswell v. State
This text of 85 S.W. 1076 (Boswell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The indictment contains two counts, charging appellant with living in adultery with Amanda Lenox. *Page 48 The first count charges they lived together and had carnal intercourse; and the second, the offense was committed by habitual carnal intercourse without living together. It is conceded by the State that conviction could not be had under the first count under the facts. Under the second count Amanda Lenox testified for the State that during the summer and fall of 1903, she had intercourse with appellant six times; that she was working in the family of appellant, whose wife was sick, and she was working in the capacity of cook and general servant. Four of these acts occurred in the house. She occupied this relation about seven months. This evidence does not prove the second count; that is, that they had habitual carnal intercourse with each other. Collins v. State, 10 Texas Ct. Rep., 1020. For want of sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Henderson, Judge, absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.W. 1076, 48 Tex. Crim. 47, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boswell-v-state-texcrimapp-1905.