Boswell v. State

85 S.W. 1076, 48 Tex. Crim. 47, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 89
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 8, 1905·No. No. 3183.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

The indictment contains two counts, charging appellant with living in adultery with Amanda Lenox. *Page 48 The first count charges they lived together and had carnal intercourse; and the second, the offense was committed by habitual carnal intercourse without living together. It is conceded by the State that conviction could not be had under the first count under the facts. Under the second count Amanda Lenox testified for the State that during the summer and fall of 1903, she had intercourse with appellant six times; that she was working in the family of appellant, whose wife was sick, and she was working in the capacity of cook and general servant. Four of these acts occurred in the house. She occupied this relation about seven months. This evidence does not prove the second count; that is, that they had habitual carnal intercourse with each other. Collins v. State, 10 Texas Ct. Rep., 1020. For want of sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Henderson, Judge, absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boswell v. State, 85 S.W. 1076, 48 Tex. Crim. 47, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 89 (Tex. 1905).

85 S.W. 1076 (Boswell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burnett v. State
228 S.W. 239 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Cordill v. State
201 S.W. 181 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Anderson v. State
193 S.W. 301 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
State v. Gardner
174 Iowa 748 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1916)
Wallace v. State
141 S.W. 95 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)