Boswell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Boswell v. State

470 S.W.3d 28, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 879, 2015 WL 5133998

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 1, 2015·No. WD 78171·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam

Calvin Boswell appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.1 5 motion after he was convicted of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, first-degree assault, unlawful use of a weapon, and four counts of armed criminal action. Boswell contends he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call a witness who would have offered testimony implicating an additional person in the crimes. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam

Calvin Boswell appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.1 5 motion after he was convicted of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, first-degree assault, unlawful use of a weapon, and four counts of armed criminal action. Boswell contends he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call a witness who would have offered testimony implicating an additional person in the crimes. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Boswell v. State, 470 S.W.3d 28, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 879, 2015 WL 5133998 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

470 S.W.3d 28 (Boswell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.