Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Boswell v. State

Boswell v. State

17 S.E. 805, 92 Ga. 581
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 17, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 17 S.E. 805 (Boswell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boswell v. State, 17 S.E. 805, 92 Ga. 581 (Ga. 1893).

Opinion

[581]*581 Judgment affirmed.

There was testimony by several -witnesses tending to show a good character for Jerry Boswell; and by Elias Boswell, tending to show an alibi, and to corroborate Jerry’s statement that Smith came that night about ten o’clock and called Jerry out of his house, and Jerry went out and, at Smith’s solicitation, exchanged him a ham for two sacks of flour. Jerry also stated that he was innocent of breaking open the house and knew nothing about it, and did not know who put that flour m the stable. J. H. Holland, by brief, for plaintiff in error. IT. Gr. Lewis, solicitor-general, by Hines, Shubrick & Felder, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lord v. State
215 S.E.2d 493 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Sutton v. State
162 S.E.2d 445 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Self v. State
132 S.E.2d 548 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Gilbert v. State
109 S.E. 697 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Baker v. State
81 S.E. 805 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 S.E. 805, 92 Ga. 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boswell-v-state-ga-1893.