Boswell v. Howell

275 So. 2d 658, 290 Ala. 228, 1973 Ala. LEXIS 1305
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 5, 1973·No. SC 137·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No reason is asserted why the decree of the trial court should be reversed. It is, therefore, affirmed.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by THOMAS S. LAWSON, Supernumerary Associate Justice, and adopted by the Court as its opinion.

Affirmed.

HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, COLEMAN, HARWOOD, BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, McCALL, FAULKNER and JONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boswell v. Howell, 275 So. 2d 658, 290 Ala. 228, 1973 Ala. LEXIS 1305 (Ala. 1973).

275 So. 2d 658 (Boswell v. Howell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.