Boswell v. Howell

275 So. 2d 658, 290 Ala. 228, 1973 Ala. LEXIS 1305
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 5, 1973
DocketSC 137
StatusPublished

This text of 275 So. 2d 658 (Boswell v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boswell v. Howell, 275 So. 2d 658, 290 Ala. 228, 1973 Ala. LEXIS 1305 (Ala. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No reason is asserted why the decree of the trial court should be reversed. It is, therefore, affirmed.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by THOMAS S. LAWSON, Supernumerary Associate Justice, and adopted by the Court as its opinion.

Affirmed.

HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, COLEMAN, HARWOOD, BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, McCALL, FAULKNER and JONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 So. 2d 658, 290 Ala. 228, 1973 Ala. LEXIS 1305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boswell-v-howell-ala-1973.