Boswell v. . Chappell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Boswell v. . Chappell

136 S.E. 722, 193 N.C. 831, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 472

DecidedFebruary 23, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 722 (Boswell v. . Chappell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boswell v. . Chappell, 136 S.E. 722, 193 N.C. 831, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 472 (N.C. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence is to be taken in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, and they are entitled to the benefit of every reasonable intendment upon the evidence, and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom.

"We think there was sufficieht evidence, more than a scintilla, to be submitted to the jury as to payment of the notes. As the case goes back to be heard before a jury, we will not set out the evidence.

For the reasons given the judgment is

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence is to be taken in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, and they are entitled to the benefit of every reasonable intendment upon the evidence, and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom.

"We think there was sufficieht evidence, more than a scintilla, to be submitted to the jury as to payment of the notes. As the case goes back to be heard before a jury, we will not set out the evidence.

For the reasons given the judgment is

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E. 722, 193 N.C. 831, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boswell-v-chappell-nc-1927.