Bostwick v. Massee & Felton Lumber Co.

71 S.E. 499, 9 Ga. App. 363, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 554
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 7, 1911·No. 3028·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Rowell, J.

1. Although it is the duty of the trial judge to construe a written contract, still if, instead of doing so, he submits the contract to the jury for construction, the judgment will not be reversed therefor, where it appears that the proper construction would have been adverse to the contention of the complaining party. Moss Mfg. Co. v. Carolina Portland Cement Co., 1 Ga. App. 232 (57 S. E. 914).

2. In this case, upon a proper construction of the contract, a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was demanded; and in this view the alleged errors in the rulings of the court are harmless, even if the rulings complained of were in any wise erroneous. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bostwick v. Massee & Felton Lumber Co., 71 S.E. 499, 9 Ga. App. 363, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 554 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

71 S.E. 499 (Bostwick v. Massee & Felton Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Port Wentworth Terminal Corp. v. Leavitt
110 S.E. 686 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)