Bostwick v. Lewis

1 Day 33
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 1, 1802·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

the judgment was affirmed, New-berry, Seymour, and Allen, Axis, dissenting.

Depositions, under similar circumstances, have always been admitted, before our Courts. The objection, therefore, is too late. There is a difficulty of convicting any man, who deposes out of the State, of perjury, unless he should come into this State $ but this never formed an objection against reading such depositions. In the case of Omichundv. Barker, (a) the Court were, on this point, unanimous.

The testimony respecting Nichols’s confessions, was proper, to shew the amount of damages ; and, though it might affect the others, that forms no reason why it should not affect him. He, though defaulted, was op trial as to the quantum of damages ; for the verdict ascertains damages as to all the defendants.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bostwick v. Lewis, 1 Day 33 (Colo. 1802).

1 Day 33 (Bostwick v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Jones
5 Ala. 694 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1843)
Reitenbach v. Reitenbach
1 Rawle 362 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1828)
Bound v. Lathrop
4 Conn. 336 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1822)