Bostwick v. Lewis

1 Day 33
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 1, 1802·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

the judgment was affirmed, New-berry, Seymour, and Allen, Axis, dissenting.

Depositions, under similar circumstances, have always been admitted, before our Courts. The objection, therefore, is too late. There is a difficulty of convicting any man, who deposes out of the State, of perjury, unless he should come into this State $ but this never formed an objection against reading such depositions. In the case of Omichundv. Barker,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bostwick v. Lewis, 1 Day 33 (Colo. 1802).

1 Day 33 (Bostwick v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Jones
5 Ala. 694 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1843)
Reitenbach v. Reitenbach
1 Rawle 362 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1828)
Bound v. Lathrop
4 Conn. 336 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1822)