Bostwick v. Bostwick

201 So. 2d 779, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4677
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 1967·No. No. 1470·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order requiring the appellant (plaintiff) to pay temporary attorneys’ fees and costs in a divorce action.

The primary thrust of plaintiff’s appeal deals with the assertion that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding temporary attorneys’ fees and costs.

A determination of plaintiff’s contention requires an examination of the testimony and evidence considered by the trial court on which the order was based. The order appealed was entered after two separate hearings. The first hearing was not steno-graphically recorded and consequently was not included in appellant’s appendix. F. A.R. 4.2, subd. d, 31 F.S.A.

It is incumbent upon 'the appellant to bring to the appellate court the record necessary for a determination of the appeal. The record in the case sub judice is [780] insufficient for a determination of plaintiff’s contention.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS and CROSS, JJ., and COOPER, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bostwick v. Bostwick, 201 So. 2d 779, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4677 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

201 So. 2d 779 (Bostwick v. Bostwick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southeast Florida Cable, Inc. v. Islandia I Condominium Ass'n
661 So. 2d 91 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Kasha v. Kasha
339 So. 2d 717 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Koblinski v. Koblinski
339 So. 2d 266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Reicheck v. Florida Bond & Mortgage Co.
237 So. 2d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Carroll v. Allen
219 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Warner v. Harris Miami Beach, Inc.
219 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)