Bostwick v. Antuono

150 So. 731, 116 Fla. 208, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1638
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 26, 1933·Published

Opinions

This cause having been submitted from the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., and BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bostwick v. Antuono, 150 So. 731, 116 Fla. 208, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1638 (Fla. 1933).

150 So. 731 (Bostwick v. Antuono) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee v. Royal Indemnity Company
149 So. 2d 606 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)
Luria v. Bank of Coral Gables
142 So. 901 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Bond v. Hewitt
149 So. 606 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Walls v. Endel
20 Fla. 86 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1883)