Bostrom v. State

732 So. 2d 1228, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7833, 1999 WL 375593
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 11, 1999
DocketNo. 99-989
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 732 So. 2d 1228 (Bostrom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bostrom v. State, 732 So. 2d 1228, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7833, 1999 WL 375593 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mark Bostrom petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus. Bostrom claims that he was released from custody through no fault of his own and is entitled to credit for the period he should have been serving time in the Department of Corrections.

[1229]*1229We agree with the State that Bostrom is seeking post-sentence credit which is the responsibility of the Department of Corrections to administer. He must exhaust administrative remedies available to him before he seeks relief from this court.

The petition is dismissed without prejudice to refile after he has exhausted his administrative remedies.

PETITION DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

GRIFFIN, C.J., GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norris v. State
275 So. 3d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
State v. Mendiola
919 So. 2d 471 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
732 So. 2d 1228, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7833, 1999 WL 375593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bostrom-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.