Bostrom v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bostrom v. State

732 So. 2d 1228, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7833, 1999 WL 375593

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 11, 1999·No. No. 99-989·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mark Bostrom petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus. Bostrom claims that he was released from custody through no fault of his own and is entitled to credit for the period he should have been serving time in the Department of Corrections.

[1229] We agree with the State that Bostrom is seeking post-sentence credit which is the responsibility of the Department of Corrections to administer. He must exhaust administrative remedies available to him before he seeks relief from this court.

The petition is dismissed without prejudice to refile after he has exhausted his administrative remedies.

PETITION DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

GRIFFIN, C.J., GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mark Bostrom petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus. Bostrom claims that he was released from custody through no fault of his own and is entitled to credit for the period he should have been serving time in the Department of Corrections.

[1229] We agree with the State that Bostrom is seeking post-sentence credit which is the responsibility of the Department of Corrections to administer. He must exhaust administrative remedies available to him before he seeks relief from this court.

The petition is dismissed without prejudice to refile after he has exhausted his administrative remedies.

PETITION DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

GRIFFIN, C.J., GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Bostrom v. State, 732 So. 2d 1228, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7833, 1999 WL 375593 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

732 So. 2d 1228 (Bostrom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related