Boston v. State

614 So. 2d 694, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 17, 1993
DocketNo. 91-03515
StatusPublished

This text of 614 So. 2d 694 (Boston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boston v. State, 614 So. 2d 694, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Terrence Doston, challenges his sentence as an adult although he was a minor at the time his crimes were committed. He claims the trial court erred by so sentencing him without benefit of a [695]*695predispositional report or written findings in accordance with section 39.059(7), Florida Statutes (1991). He is correct. State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla.1984); Cobb v. State, 586 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

We reverse the appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with section 39.059(7), State v. Rhoden, and Cobb v. State.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Rhoden
448 So. 2d 1013 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Cobb v. State
586 So. 2d 1298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
614 So. 2d 694, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boston-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.