Boston v. State

614 So. 2d 694, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Boston v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11334
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 1993·No. No. 91-03515·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Terrence Doston, challenges his sentence as an adult although he was a minor at the time his crimes were committed. He claims the trial court erred by so sentencing him without benefit of a [695]*695predispositional report or written findings in accordance with section 39.059(7), Florida Statutes (1991). He is correct. State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla.1984); Cobb v. State, 586 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

We reverse the appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with section 39.059(7), State v. Rhoden, and Cobb v. State.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boston v. State, 614 So. 2d 694, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

614 So. 2d 694 (Boston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rhoden
448 So. 2d 1013 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Cobb v. State
586 So. 2d 1298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)