Boston v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boston v. State

614 So. 2d 694, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 1993·No. No. 91-03515·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Terrence Doston, challenges his sentence as an adult although he was a minor at the time his crimes were committed. He claims the trial court erred by so sentencing him without benefit of a [695] predispositional report or written findings in accordance with section 39.059(7), Florida Statutes (1991). He is correct. State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla.1984); Cobb v. State, 586 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

We reverse the appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with section 39.059(7), State v. Rhoden, and Cobb v. State.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Terrence Doston, challenges his sentence as an adult although he was a minor at the time his crimes were committed. He claims the trial court erred by so sentencing him without benefit of a [695] predispositional report or written findings in accordance with section 39.059(7), Florida Statutes (1991). He is correct. State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla.1984); Cobb v. State, 586 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

We reverse the appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with section 39.059(7), State v. Rhoden, and Cobb v. State.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Boston v. State, 614 So. 2d 694, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

614 So. 2d 694 (Boston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related