Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp.
This text of Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp. (Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 21-1775 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 03/10/2022
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORP., Appellant
v.
NEVRO CORP., Appellee ______________________
2021-1775 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019- 01284. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
Z.W. JULIUS CHEN, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by PRATIK A. SHAH; MICHAEL P. KAHN, New York, NY; DAVID A. CAINE, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA; MATTHEW WOLF, Washington, DC.
RYAN C. MORRIS, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by THOMAS ANTHONY BROUGHAN, III; CHING-LEE FUKUDA, SHARON LEE, New Case: 21-1775 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 03/10/2022
York, NY; JON WRIGHT, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, CHEN and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 10, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boston-scientific-v-nevro-corp-cafc-2022.