Boston Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp.
This text of Boston Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp. (Boston Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CORDIS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
2012-1316 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 10-CV-0315, Judge Sue L. Robinson. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
YOUNG J. PARK, Fish & Richardson, P.C., of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellees.
GREGORY L. DISKANT, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was EUGENE M. GELERNTER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 12, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Boston Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boston-scientific-corp-v-cordis-corp-cafc-2013.