Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Chile Gold Mining Co.

Supreme Court

Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Chile Gold Mining Co.

188 U.S. 645, 23 S. Ct. 440, 47 L. Ed. 634, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1309

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 23, 1903

DocketNo. 104

StatusPublished

This text of 188 U.S. 645 (Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Chile Gold Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Chile Gold Mining Co., 188 U.S. 645, 23 S. Ct. 440, 47 L. Ed. 634, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1309 (1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Mb. Justicie Peceham

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case involves the same questions' as that of the Boston and Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company v. The Montana Ore Purchasing Company &c., (No. 103,) ante, p. 632, the only point of difference between the two being that the Chile Gold Mining Company and the other defendants herein are sued as lessees of the Montana Ore Purchasing Companjq they having as such lessees attempted to interfere with the complainant’s right of property. The complaint was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in No. 103, this decree is also

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mb. Justicie Peceham

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case involves the same questions' as that of the Boston and Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company v. The Montana Ore Purchasing Company &c., (No. 103,) ante, p. 632, the only point of difference between the two being that the Chile Gold Mining Company and the other defendants herein are sued as lessees of the Montana Ore Purchasing Companjq they having as such lessees attempted to interfere with the complainant’s right of property. The complaint was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in No. 103, this decree is also

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 U.S. 645, 23 S. Ct. 440, 47 L. Ed. 634, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boston-montana-consolidated-copper-silver-mining-co-v-chile-gold-scotus-1903.