Boston & Montana Consol. Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.

59 P. 919, 23 Mont. 557, 1900 Mont. LEXIS 91
Montana Supreme Court·Decided February 8, 1900·No. No. 1,461·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— We have examined the record in this case, and carefully considered all the points made by counsel. It involves the right of the plaintiffs to an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendants from passing to and fro through a fractional portion of the Johnstown mining claim, belonging to the plaintiff, by means of underground workings. The lower court heard the application for an injunction pendente lite, and denied it. Plaintiff appeals.

It does not appear that -the grievances complained of will work irreparable inj ury to plaintiff pending the determination of the suit. There was, therefore, no clear abuse of discretion. Order affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boston & Montana Consol. Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co., 59 P. 919, 23 Mont. 557, 1900 Mont. LEXIS 91 (Mo. 1900).

59 P. 919 (Boston & Montana Consol. Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Brookman
7 C.M.A. 729 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
Colusa Parrot Mining & Smelting Co. v. Barnard
72 P. 45 (Montana Supreme Court, 1903)