Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States

396 U.S. 27, 90 S. Ct. 196, 24 L. Ed. 2d 142, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 447
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 10, 1969·No. No. 343·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States, 396 U.S. 27, 90 S. Ct. 196, 24 L. Ed. 2d 142, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 447 (1969).

396 U.S. 27 (Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Boston & Maine Corp.
634 F.2d 1359 (First Circuit, 1980)
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United States
619 F.2d 988 (Third Circuit, 1980)
Consolidated Rail Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Chicago and North Western Transportation Company William M. Gibbons, Trusteeof the Property of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad, as Trustee, Andnot Individually, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlingtonnortherninc., Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroadcompany, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroadcompany, Western Pacific Railroad Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Intervenors. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlington Northern Inc., Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company,western Pacificrailroad Company v. The United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Stanley E. G. Hillman, Trustee of the Property of the Chicago, Milwaukee, st.paul and Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor ("Milwaukee Railroad"), Intervenors. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Companyand Soo Line Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlington Northern Inc.,missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company,southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Andwesternpacific Railroad Company, Intervenors
619 F.2d 988 (Third Circuit, 1980)
Baltimore v. United States
583 F.2d 678 (Third Circuit, 1978)
Matter of Boston & Maine Corp.
456 F. Supp. 412 (D. Massachusetts, 1978)
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Long Island Rail Road
447 F. Supp. 108 (E.D. New York, 1978)
General Mills, Inc. v. United States
364 F. Supp. 1278 (D. Minnesota, 1973)
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States
327 F. Supp. 1076 (M.D. Florida, 1971)
Long Island Railroad Company v. United States
318 F. Supp. 490 (E.D. New York, 1970)
Boston & Maine R. Co. v. United States
396 U.S. 27 (Supreme Court, 1969)