Home/Supreme Court/Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States

Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States

396 U.S. 27, 90 S. Ct. 196, 24 L. Ed. 2d 142, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 447
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 10, 1969
DocketNo. 343
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 396 U.S. 27 (Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States, 396 U.S. 27, 90 S. Ct. 196, 24 L. Ed. 2d 142, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 447 (1969).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Maine Central Railroad Company, in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Penn Central Corporation, in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Canadian Pacific, in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Eastern Associated Coal Corporation
634 F.2d 1359 (First Circuit, 1980)
In re Boston & Maine Corp.
634 F.2d 1359 (First Circuit, 1980)
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United States
619 F.2d 988 (Third Circuit, 1980)
Consolidated Rail Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Chicago and North Western Transportation Company William M. Gibbons, Trusteeof the Property of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad, as Trustee, Andnot Individually, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlingtonnortherninc., Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroadcompany, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroadcompany, Western Pacific Railroad Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Intervenors. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlington Northern Inc., Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company,western Pacificrailroad Company v. The United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Stanley E. G. Hillman, Trustee of the Property of the Chicago, Milwaukee, st.paul and Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor ("Milwaukee Railroad"), Intervenors. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Companyand Soo Line Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlington Northern Inc.,missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company,southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Andwesternpacific Railroad Company, Intervenors
619 F.2d 988 (Third Circuit, 1980)
In the Matter of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor (4 Cases). Appeal of Maine Central Railroad Company. Appeal of Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company Appeal of Trailer Train Company. Appeal of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
600 F.2d 307 (First Circuit, 1979)
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company v. Long Island Rail Road Company
595 F.2d 96 (Second Circuit, 1979)
Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Central Vermont Railway, Inc., Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway, and the Detroit and Toledo Shore Line Railroad Company, Intervenors, Burlington Northern Inc. And Union Pacific Railroad Company, Intervenors, Duval Sales Corporation, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Evans Products Company and Pullman Leasing Company, Intervenors, the Texas Mexican Railway Company, Intervenor. Aliquippa and Southern Railroad Company v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Duval Sales Corporation, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Evans Products Company and Pullman Leasing Company, Intervenors, the Texas Mexican Railway Company, Intervenor
583 F.2d 678 (Third Circuit, 1978)
Baltimore v. United States
583 F.2d 678 (Third Circuit, 1978)
Matter of Boston & Maine Corp.
456 F. Supp. 412 (D. Massachusetts, 1978)
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Long Island Rail Road
447 F. Supp. 108 (E.D. New York, 1978)
Consolidated Rail Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc., Intervenors
567 F.2d 64 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
Illinois Terminal Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission
541 F.2d 201 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)
General Mills, Inc. v. United States
364 F. Supp. 1278 (D. Minnesota, 1973)
Pacific Fruit Express Co. v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad
355 F. Supp. 700 (N.D. California, 1973)
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States
327 F. Supp. 1076 (M.D. Florida, 1971)
Long Island Railroad Company v. United States
318 F. Supp. 490 (E.D. New York, 1970)
Boston & Maine R. Co. v. United States
396 U.S. 27 (Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
396 U.S. 27, 90 S. Ct. 196, 24 L. Ed. 2d 142, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boston-maine-railroad-v-united-states-scotus-1969.