Boston & Maine Railroad v. Union Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Boston & Maine Railroad v. Union Street Railway Co.

35 A. 1129, 68 N.H. 604

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedDecember 5, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 A. 1129 (Boston & Maine Railroad v. Union Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boston & Maine Railroad v. Union Street Railway Co., 35 A. 1129, 68 N.H. 604 (N.H. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Assumpsit, for eighty-four tons of iron rails. The court ordered a verdict for the defendants, and the plaintiffs excepted. It appearing that one C. bargained with the plaintiffs for the iron, that he was not the defendants’ agent and had no authority from them to make the purchase, and there being no other evidence tending to show that the defendants contracted for the iron, the exceptions were overruled.

Smith, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assumpsit, for eighty-four tons of iron rails. The court ordered a verdict for the defendants, and the plaintiffs excepted. It appearing that one C. bargained with the plaintiffs for the iron, that he was not the defendants’ agent and had no authority from them to make the purchase, and there being no other evidence tending to show that the defendants contracted for the iron, the exceptions were overruled.

Smith, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 A. 1129, 68 N.H. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boston-maine-railroad-v-union-street-railway-co-nh-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack