Boston & Maine Railroad v. Union Street Railway Co.
35 A. 1129, 68 N.H. 604
Opinion
Assumpsit, for eighty-four tons of iron rails. The court ordered a verdict for the defendants, and the plaintiffs excepted. It appearing that one C. bargained with the plaintiffs for the iron, that he was not the defendants’ agent and had no authority from them to make the purchase, and there being no other evidence tending to show that the defendants contracted for the iron, the exceptions were overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boston & Maine Railroad v. Union Street Railway Co., 35 A. 1129, 68 N.H. 604 (N.H. 1894).
35 A. 1129 (Boston & Maine Railroad v. Union Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Julius C. Wolf Co. v. Fitzpatrick & Co.
12 Teiss. 194 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1915)