Boston & Maine Railroad v. Montgomery

119 Mass. 114, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 84
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 5, 1875·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The bill of exceptions shows that the witness was allowed to estimate in money the value of the land taken, and leaves it at least doubtful whether he was not allowed to estimate in the same way the amount of the inconveniences resulting to a farmer from being deprived of access to the river — • so that the consequent diminution in value would be ascertained by deducting the one sum from the other, which could easily be done by the jury — and does not show that the owners of the land claimed damages by reason of being excluded from the river bank for any purposes as to which the witness had any special or superior knowledge. The landowners therefore fail to sustain their exceptions. Exception» overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boston & Maine Railroad v. Montgomery, 119 Mass. 114, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 84 (Mass. 1875).

119 Mass. 114 (Boston & Maine Railroad v. Montgomery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diedrich v. Northwestern Union Railway Co.
47 Wis. 662 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1879)