Boston & Maine Railroad v. Chipman
This text of 14 N.E. 940 (Boston & Maine Railroad v. Chipman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The contract, of which the hook and the coupons therein sold to the defendant by the plaintiff are the evidence, is a reasonable and valid one. Under it the plaintiff’s conductor was not required to accept as the defendant’s fare a detached coupon, and had at least the right to demand that he should produce and show the book.
There was no evidence which would justify the finding that the plaintiff had rescinded or waived any of the conditions or terms of the contract. Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 N.E. 940, 146 Mass. 107, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boston-maine-railroad-v-chipman-mass-1888.