Boston & Maine Railroad v. Chipman
14 N.E. 940, 146 Mass. 107, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 206
Opinion
The contract, of which the hook and the coupons therein sold to the defendant by the plaintiff are the evidence, is a reasonable and valid one. Under it the plaintiff’s conductor was not required to accept as the defendant’s fare a detached coupon, and had at least the right to demand that he should produce and show the book.
There was no evidence which would justify the finding that the plaintiff had rescinded or waived any of the conditions or terms of the contract. Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boston & Maine Railroad v. Chipman, 14 N.E. 940, 146 Mass. 107, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 206 (Mass. 1888).
14 N.E. 940 (Boston & Maine Railroad v. Chipman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Burtnett
58 Pa. Super. 604 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
Harmon v. Jensen
176 F. 519 (Sixth Circuit, 1909)
Rogers v. Kennebec Steamboat Co.
25 L.R.A. 491 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1894)
Fonseca v. Cunard Steamship Co.
12 L.R.A. 340 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)
Drummond v. Southern Pacific Co.
7 Utah 118 (Utah Supreme Court, 1891)
Quimby v. Boston & Maine Railroad
5 L.R.A. 846 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)