Boston & Maine R. Co. v. United States
This text of 371 U.S. 26 (Boston & Maine R. Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Joseph F. Eshelman, James Garfield, Conrad W. Oberdorfer, Kenneth H. Lundmark, R. G. Bleakney, Jr., R. D. Brooks, R. B. Claytor, E. A. Kaier, W. T. Pierson and D. M. Tolmie for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
R. Wray Henriott, W. L. Grubbs and Joseph L. Lenihan for the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
371 U.S. 26, 83 S. Ct. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boston-maine-r-co-v-united-states-scotus-1962.