BOSTON INVESTORS GROUP, INC. v. Spatz

43 So. 3d 149, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12393, 2010 WL 3324670
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 2010·No. 3D09-1358·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order entered in a probate proceeding, which denied the motion of Boston Investors Group, Inc. for an enlargement of time to file a proof of claim, and striking the statement of claim. Based on the record before us, we conclude that the claim against the Estate of Carl Spatz arose prior to the death of the decedent for purposes of subsection 733.702(1), Florida Statutes (2008). We have considered Boston’s argument that the claims did not accrue until after the death of the decedent, but are not persuaded thereby. As no grounds existed for an extension of time under subsection 733.702(3), the trial court properly denied the motion for extension of time. The issues were properly framed by Boston’s motion and the Estate’s response thereto.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOSTON INVESTORS GROUP, INC. v. Spatz, 43 So. 3d 149, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12393, 2010 WL 3324670 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

43 So. 3d 149 (BOSTON INVESTORS GROUP, INC. v. Spatz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaw v. State
43 So. 3d 149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)