Boston, Concord & Montreal Railroad v. State

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Boston, Concord & Montreal Railroad v. State

13 A. 874, 64 N.H. 490

DecidedDecember 5, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A. 874 (Boston, Concord & Montreal Railroad v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boston, Concord & Montreal Railroad v. State, 13 A. 874, 64 N.H. 490 (N.H. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

*491 By the Court.

A railroad corporation is required to pay its tax to the state treasurer, notwithstanding- it has applied to the supreme court for an abatement of the same. If judgment shall be rendered for any reduction, “ the state treasurer shall credit and allow the same upon the tax against said railroad corporation collectible next subsequent to such judgment.” Laws 1881, c. 53, s. 1. The statute is mandatory.

Motion denied.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*491 By the Court.

A railroad corporation is required to pay its tax to the state treasurer, notwithstanding- it has applied to the supreme court for an abatement of the same. If judgment shall be rendered for any reduction, “ the state treasurer shall credit and allow the same upon the tax against said railroad corporation collectible next subsequent to such judgment.” Laws 1881, c. 53, s. 1. The statute is mandatory.

Motion denied.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A. 874, 64 N.H. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boston-concord-montreal-railroad-v-state-nh-1887.