Bostick v. State

537 So. 2d 706, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 308, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 493, 1989 WL 6464
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 1989·No. No. 88-642·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ERVIN, Judge.

Appellant, charged in Count I of an information with manslaughter, by hitting the victim with a motor vehicle, and in Count II with grand theft, was found guilty by the jury of the lesser offense of culpable negligence by causing injury, a first degree misdemeanor, and grand theft. Following the trial, appellant moved and was granted a new trial on the grand theft charge only, and the case as to that offense is still pending. The judgment of guilt, however, reflects that appellant was found guilty of the offense of “CT. 1, GRAND THEFT,” rather than the offense of culpable negligence. This is error because appellant was granted a new trial on the grand theft charge.

The judgment is REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for entry of a corrected judgment.

SMITH, C.J., and NIMMONS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bostick v. State, 537 So. 2d 706, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 308, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 493, 1989 WL 6464 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

537 So. 2d 706 (Bostick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. Rose
537 So. 2d 706 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)