Bostick v. Godwin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bostick v. Godwin

107 S.E. 585, 151 Ga. 559, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 329

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 13, 1921

DocketNo. 2368

StatusPublished

This text of 107 S.E. 585 (Bostick v. Godwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bostick v. Godwin, 107 S.E. 585, 151 Ga. 559, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 329 (Ga. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. Where, on the interlocutory hearing, during but before final adjournment of the appearance term, of an application for injunction, the plaintiff interposed a demurrer to the answer of the defendant, and the court “ declined to pass upon the demurrer but duly considered the same along with the whole case,” such refusal to pass upon the demurrer separately was not error.

2. On conflicting evidence the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed,.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

1. Where, on the interlocutory hearing, during but before final adjournment of the appearance term, of an application for injunction, the plaintiff interposed a demurrer to the answer of the defendant, and the court “ declined to pass upon the demurrer but duly considered the same along with the whole case,” such refusal to pass upon the demurrer separately was not error.

2. On conflicting evidence the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed,.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 S.E. 585, 151 Ga. 559, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bostick-v-godwin-ga-1921.