Bostick v. Commonwealth

268 S.W. 289, 206 Ky. 633, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 1007
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJanuary 16, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 S.W. 289 (Bostick v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bostick v. Commonwealth, 268 S.W. 289, 206 Ky. 633, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 1007 (Ky. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Reversing.

Under an indictment charging appellant with all the offenses denounced by section 2554a-l, Kentucky Statutes, the Commonwealth elected to try him for that of “manufacturing moonshine liquor.” The evidence fails to disclose that the offense for which appellant was tried was committed within twelve months before the finding of the indictment.

Judgment reversed with directions to grant appellant a new trial herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maddox v. Commonwealth
298 S.W. 688 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 S.W. 289, 206 Ky. 633, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bostick-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1925.