Bostich v. United States Trust Corp.

233 A.D.2d 193, 650 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11805
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered August 23, 1995, which granted defendants’ motion to [194] dismiss for failure to state a cause of action and for sanctions pursuant to CPLR 8303-a, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The action was properly dismissed because plaintiffs failed to establish any link between the allegedly defamatory utterances and the parties being sued. Moreover, the statements, viewed in context, are constitutionally protected expressions of opinion. We also agree with the IAS Court that the action is frivolous and a sanction of $500 against plaintiffs and $500 against their attorneys is warranted pursuant to CPLR 8303-a. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bostich v. United States Trust Corp., 233 A.D.2d 193, 650 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

233 A.D.2d 193 (Bostich v. United States Trust Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doscher v. Meyer
2019 NY Slip Op 8171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)