Bostic v. State

777 S.W.2d 738, 1989 Tex. App. LEXIS 2652, 1989 WL 126336
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 30, 1989·No. No. 09-88-316 CR·Published

Opinion

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

Appellant pleaded no contest to the charge of aggravated sexual assault. He signed no judicial confessions or made no judicial admission in court. The State introduced copies of the victim’s statement and police reports. The court found appellant guilty and, at a later hearing, assessed punishment at sixty years in the Texas Department of Corrections. Appellant urges two points of error, the evidence was insufficient to prove jurisdiction in this state and venue in the county. He argues no evidence was presented to show the offense occurred in Jefferson County, Texas. We affirm.

TEX.R.APP.P. 80(d) provides that a court of appeals shall presume that venue was proved in the court below “unless such matters were made an issue in the court below....” This presumption applies to venue both within the State of Texas, Whalon v. State, 725 S.W.2d 181 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), and within a particular county, Holdridge v. State, 707 S.W.2d 18 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). Since appellant did not make an issue of the venue in the court below, the presumption applies. Both points are overruled, and the judgment affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bostic v. State, 777 S.W.2d 738, 1989 Tex. App. LEXIS 2652, 1989 WL 126336 (Tex. Ct. App. 1989).

777 S.W.2d 738 (Bostic v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whalon v. State
725 S.W.2d 181 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Holdridge v. State
707 S.W.2d 18 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)