Bostic v. State

708 So. 2d 695, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4748
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 29, 1998·No. Nos. 96-4960, 96-4962·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant died during the pendency of his appeal challenging various convictions and sentences. The estate of the appellant has opposed the state’s motion to dismiss on grounds of mootness, contending that the appeal is not moot because the trial court imposed a fine upon the appellant that the state could attempt to collect from the appellant’s estate. However, in light of the state’s representation to this court that “[t]he State will not attempt to collect the fine from Appellant’s estate,” we conclude that the appellant has not demonstrated good cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. See State v. Clements, 668 So.2d 980 (Fla.1996).

We accordingly dismiss the appeal as moot.

BARFIELD, C.J., and ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bostic v. State, 708 So. 2d 695, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4748 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

708 So. 2d 695 (Bostic v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Florida v. Nathaniel F. Green
256 So. 3d 957 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)