Bossert v. S. Jarvis Adams Co.

135 F. 1015, 14 Ohio F. Dec. 728, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4391
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 1905
DocketNo. 1,363
StatusPublished

This text of 135 F. 1015 (Bossert v. S. Jarvis Adams Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bossert v. S. Jarvis Adams Co., 135 F. 1015, 14 Ohio F. Dec. 728, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4391 (6th Cir. 1905).

Opinion

SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.

This case is in all essential particulars like that of Knapp v. S. Jarvis Adams Co. (No. 1,362, just decided) 135 Fed. 1008, was heard on the same record, and, by agreement of counsel, is subject to the same disposition.

For the reasons given in our opinion in that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knapp v. S. Jarvis Adams Co.
135 F. 1008 (Sixth Circuit, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 F. 1015, 14 Ohio F. Dec. 728, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bossert-v-s-jarvis-adams-co-ca6-1905.