Bossart v. King County

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: February 11, 2025
• Docket: 2:24-cv-01776
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 ALICE BOSSART, RAYMOND BERRY, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-01776-JHC 8

ORDER 9 Plaintiffs, 10 v. 11 KING COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, 12

13 Defendant. 14

15 Before the Court are pro se “Plaintiffs’ Rule 12(f) Motion to Strike Defendant’s Entire 16 Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment In Lieu of a Reply in Support of 17 Summary Judgment for Causes of Insufficiency, Immateriality, and Scandalous Lack of 18 Candor,” Dkt. # 17, and pro se “Plaintiffs’ Motion Requesting Judicial Ruling on Plaintiffs’ 19 Unopposed Rule 12(f) Motion to Strike Defendant’s Entire Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for 20 Summary Judgment In Lieu of a Reply in Support of Summary Judgment for Causes of 21 Insufficiency, Immateriality, and Scandalous Lack of Candor,” Dkt. # 19. For the reasons below, 22 the Court DENIES both motions. 23 24 1 Challenges under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) are limited to challenges to 2 pleadings, such as a complaint or answer. See Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co., 697 F.2d 880, 3 885 (9th Cir. 1983). Plaintiffs’ motion to strike improperly seeks to use Rule 12(f) to have the

4 Court strike Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion. And even if the rule 5 did apply to briefing, the Court does not see how Defendant’s statements in their response falls 6 within the substantive scope of the rule – much less warrant the striking of the whole document.1 7 Thus, the Court DENIES the motion to strike. 8 The request for a judicial ruling is DENIED as moot, as the Court has now ruled on the 9 motion to strike. But the Court also DENIES the motion because no legal authority supports it. 10 The Court considers the filing of a motion to be a request that the Court rule on it. There is no 11 need for a “follow-up” motion. 12 Dated this 11th day of February, 2025. 13 14 a John H. Chun 15 United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

1 The motion to strike challenges the arguments in Defendant’s response, and the Court will 24 consider the substance of the motion to strike in connection with Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion.