Bossart v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California·Decided October 24, 2022·No. 3:22-cv-01183·Unknown

Opinion

JUDITH LEE FRARY, Case No.: 22cv1183-JO-MDD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. SUBSTITUTE PARTY KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Plaintiff Judith Frary filed this social security appeal on August 12, 2022. Dkt. 1. After Plaintiff Frary died, her sister Jane Bossart filed a motion to substitute Plaintiff as the real party in interest under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25. Dkt. 5. Rule 25 provides that after the death of a party, the deceased party’s successor or representative may move to substitute as the proper party by filing a motion within 90 days of serving notice of the party’s death. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). Barlow v. Ground, 39 F.3d 231, 233 (9th Cir. 1994) (first, “a party must formally suggest the death of the party upon the record” and then, “the suggesting party must serve other parties . . . with a suggestion of death in the same manner as required for service of the motion to substitute.”). Here, Ms. Bossart filed and served notice of Plaintiff’s death within 90 days and requested to substitute the deceased Plaintiff as the real party in interest. See Dkt. 5. Ms. Bossart submitted the declarations of Plaintiff’s other surviving siblings designating Ms. Bossart as the representative in this matter. See Dkt. 13. Defendant did not oppose the motion. See Dkt. 12. Accordingly, because the requirements of Rule 25 are met, the Court GRANTS the motion [Dkt. 5]. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 24, 2022

____________________ Hon. Jinsook Ohta United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bossart v. Kijakazi, (S.D. Cal. 2022).

Bossart v. Kijakazi (Bossart v. Kijakazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related