Boss v. LOOMIS, EWERT, PARSLEY, DAVIS & GOTTING, PC
784 N.W.2d 813
Opinion
Jack BOSS and Mari Boss, Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants/Appellants,
v.
LOOMIS, EWERT, PARSLEY, DAVIS & GOTTING, P.C., Kelly K. Reed, Catherine A. Jacobs, Kevin J. Roragen, William Culbertson, S. Whitfield Lee, and R. Andrew Gately, Defendants-Appellees, and
Tall Grass Investment Corporation, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/Appellee, and
Eagle Transport Services, Inc., Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boss v. LOOMIS, EWERT, PARSLEY, DAVIS & GOTTING, PC, 784 N.W.2d 813 (Mich. 2010).
784 N.W.2d 813 (Boss v. LOOMIS, EWERT, PARSLEY, DAVIS & GOTTING, PC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Strong
784 N.W.2d 813 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)