Bosley v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Bosley v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad

183 Ill. App. 639, 1913 Ill. App. LEXIS 1659

DecidedOctober 9, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 183 Ill. App. 639 (Bosley v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bosley v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad, 183 Ill. App. 639, 1913 Ill. App. LEXIS 1659 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Railroads, § 703*—presumption arising from excessive speed. In an action for death resulting from being struck by train running at a speed in excess of the rate fixed by law of that place, the injury will be presumed to have resulted from such negligence. 2. Railroads, § 768*—when requested instruction on duty to looh and listen properly refused. Instruction informing the jury that unless the evidence showed that the deceased before attempting to cross the track did look and listen for approaching trains she was guilty of contributory negligence, held properly refused where the question whether she did look and listen depends upon facts and circumstances surrounding the person at the time. 3. Railroads, § 772*—when instruction on relative weight of positive and negative evidence properly refused. Requested instruction containing the statement that positive evidence as to the fact that the bell was rung or whistle blown is entitled to more weight than negative evidence in relation to the same fact, held properly refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Railroads, § 703*—presumption arising from excessive speed. In an action for death resulting from being struck by train running at a speed in excess of the rate fixed by law of that place, the injury will be presumed to have resulted from such negligence. 2. Railroads, § 768*—when requested instruction on duty to looh and listen properly refused. Instruction informing the jury that unless the evidence showed that the deceased before attempting to cross the track did look and listen for approaching trains she was guilty of contributory negligence, held properly refused where the question whether she did look and listen depends upon facts and circumstances surrounding the person at the time. 3. Railroads, § 772*—when instruction on relative weight of positive and negative evidence properly refused. Requested instruction containing the statement that positive evidence as to the fact that the bell was rung or whistle blown is entitled to more weight than negative evidence in relation to the same fact, held properly refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 Ill. App. 639, 1913 Ill. App. LEXIS 1659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bosley-v-baltimore-ohio-southwestern-railroad-illappct-1913.