Boslet v. Thomas

80 S.W. 115, 35 Tex. Civ. App. 144, 1904 Tex. App. LEXIS 361
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 9, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 S.W. 115 (Boslet v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boslet v. Thomas, 80 S.W. 115, 35 Tex. Civ. App. 144, 1904 Tex. App. LEXIS 361 (Tex. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

KEY, Associate Justice.

This is an action of trespass to try title, involving , 1476 acres of land. After hearing all the testimony the court instructed a verdict for the defendants, and the plaintiffs have appealed. The plaintiffs introduced testimony which, prima facie, established title in them as the heirs of Joseph Rutch, to whom the land was granted.

. The defendants introduced documentary evidence relied on by them as showing that the land was sold by the administrator of Joseph Rutch, under which title the defendants claim. Counsel for appellants admit, that if the documentary evidence referred to was admissible, it established title in the defendants, and the admissibility of that testimony is the only point presented for decision. The testimony referred to consisted of certified copies of the probate records of Harris County, as follows :

"Republic of Texas, County of Harrisburg. Hon. A. Briscoe, Judge of Probate: Your petitioner, Hiles F. Smith, represents to your honor that one Joseph Rutch died some time last summer, either in the month of July or August, and left unsettled business which requires the appointment of an administrator, and your petitioner further represents that there is no person in the Republic known to be entitled to the administration, except Mary Ann Foley, who is a sister to the deceased, and she refused to administer on said estate, and requests your petitioner to apply for administration. Wherefore your petitioner prays that he may be appointed administrator of the said estate, and he, as *145 in duty bound, will ever pray. Gayley & Birdsall, Attys. Pet’r., Hiles F. Smith.
“Estate of Joseph Butch, Bepublic of Texas, County of Harrisburg. Probate Court, 27th Hovember, 1837. For the Administration. Hiles F. Smith petitioned for the administration of the estate of Joseph Butch, deceased: Ordered that notice be given to all persons interested to file objections on or before the 7th day of December, next, or the prayer of petitioner will be granted. Agreeably* to the above order, notice was this day given. D. W. Clinton Harris, Clerk.
• “December 12, 1837. There being no objection filed to his appointment, it is ordered by the court that said Hiles F. Smith be and- he is 'hereby appointed administrator of the estate of Joseph Butch, deceased, with full and complete power to settle the succession according to law. The said Hiles F. Smith filed his bond for $1000 with James S. Holman security, and letters were issued according to order, said Smith always -to be subject to the rules and decrees of this court. D. W. Clinton Harris, Clerk.
“January Term, 1838. Ordered that the administrator be ruled to file inventory of the property of this succession at the February term, duly attested and appraised by James S. Holman and Thos. H. Mulryne.
“February Term, 1838. Ordered by the court that the business of this succession be continued.
“March Term, 1838. The administrator appeared and filed the -•following inventory: An inventory of all the property, real, personal and mixed, belonging to the succession of Joseph Butch, deceased, as . accounted of by Hiles F. Smith, administrator, and appraised by J ames S. Holman and Thomas H. Mulryne, appointed by the court of probate for that purpose, as follows, to wit:
“One-third of a league of unlocated lands amounting to one thousand one hundred and seven acres...................$600 00
“Three hundred and twenty acres of unlocated soldier scrip.... 50 00
“Three months pay in military scrip....................... 24 00
“Amounting to ........................................$674 00
“The above is a true account of the property of this succession so far as comes within my knowledge. Hiles F. Smith, Administrator. Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 23d day of March, 1838. John Shea, J. P. The above is a true valuation of the property above named as made by us in pursuance of the order of the court of probate. James S. Holman, Thos. H. Mulryne, Appraisers. Sworn to and subscribed before me this 23d day of March, Í838. John Shea, J. P.
“February term, 1839. This succession having been opened in the month of Hovember, 1837, and no settlement having been proposed, and no debts being in court, it is ordered that the bond given in favor of the judge of probates of this county in the sum of one thousand dollars, given by Hiles F. Smith, administrator, with James S. Holman, secur *146 ity, is the property of the heirs and that they have at right to collect it, and as no heirs are known to the court, it is ordered that W. F; Gray be appointed curator for the absent heirs, and that said bond be delivered to him so soon as he gives security in the sum of one thousand dollars for his faithful stewardship.
“The curator appointed by the court for this succession appeared before the clerk of court and took the oath of office prescribed by law as curator and Sled the following bond and received letters of curator-ship: ‘Republic of Texas, County of Harrisburg. Know all men by these presents that we, W. F. Gray and D. W. Clinton Harris, are held and firmly bound unto Andrew Briscoe, judge of the probate court of said county, and to his successors in office in the sum of one thousand dollars good and lawful money of this republic, for the payment of which well and truly made, we bind ourselves, our heirs and administrators forever. Conditioned: That if - the above bound W. F. Gray shall faithfully discharge his duties as curator for the absent heirs of the estate of Joseph Rutch, deceased, and shall pay to the order of the court aforesaid, all moneys that may come into his hands by virtue of his said office of curator, then this obligation to be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and virtue. Witness our hands and seals at Houston, this 23d day of March, 1839. Peter Gray [L. S-] D. W. Clinton Harris [L. S.]'
“March Term, April 3, 1840. Continued to next term of court. From the minutes in chambers, June 10, 1850. It appearing to the court upon examination of the records in the matter of this estate that the order .heretofore entered in said estate, to wit, at the February term, 1839, of the county court appointing W. F. Gray curator for absent heirs was illegal in that the succession was in due course of administration. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court that said order of appointment be and it is hereby revoked and annulled. It is further ordered that the administrator herein, Hiles F. Smith, file an annual report of the condition of said estate on or before the July-term next of court. And further ordered that citation issue accordingly and case continued.
“Sums issued in accordance with foregoing order and returned 'indorsed : ‘I acknowledge service ■ of the within writ and waive copy. June 20, 1850. James C. Walker, Attorney for Hiles F. Smith/
“Annual Report, Filed June 25, 1850. State of Texas, County of Harris. To the Hon. Chief Justice in and for said County: In answer to the writ commanding Hiles F.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pettithory v. Clarke Courts
139 S.W. 989 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 S.W. 115, 35 Tex. Civ. App. 144, 1904 Tex. App. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boslet-v-thomas-texapp-1904.