Bosler v. Rheem

72 Pa. 54, 1872 Pa. LEXIS 200
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 20, 1872
DocketNo. 87
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 72 Pa. 54 (Bosler v. Rheem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bosler v. Rheem, 72 Pa. 54, 1872 Pa. LEXIS 200 (Pa. 1872).

Opinion

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered

Per Curiam.

— We agree with the learned judge below, that ’ the agreement of even date with the note in question, the purpose of which was to waive any right to reclaim the excess of interest stipulated to be paid by the maker of the note to the payee, had not that effect. The Act 6f 1858, on this subject, was passéd to regulate the rate of interest among the people, and to change the odious system of forfeitures existing under the old law. Under the new act any lender may receive more than six per cent, interest without any penalty or forfeiture, subject only to have it recouped or reclaimed by the payor. If this be not done the party receiving the interest can hold it lawfully. We cannot, and perhaps never could, hold that this right to reclaim excessive interest may be waived in a note, or by a contemporaneous instrument. It would be better to repeal the provision altogether than this, for it would [57]*57be resorted to in every case of loan or contract. We cannot allow public policy to be set aside in this manner. The opinion of the learned judge below is a satisfactory presentation of the law on this point.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Muench v. Paine
463 P.2d 939 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1970)
Fosscett v. Lake Charles Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board
125 So. 2d 44 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960)
Marks v. Pope
7 N.E.2d 481 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1937)
City of Glendale v. Coquat
52 P.2d 1178 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1935)
Williams v. Wenger
179 A. 242 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Leon v. Zlatkin
251 N.W. 377 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)
Bolay v. Philadelphia
15 Pa. D. & C. 195 (Philadelphia County Municipal Court, 1931)
Moll v. Lafferty
153 A. 557 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Begelfer v. Rhoads
11 Pa. D. & C. 405 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 Pa. 54, 1872 Pa. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bosler-v-rheem-pa-1872.