Boshunell Charleston Shorts v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 6, 2019
• Docket: 10-19-00079-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00079-CR

BOSHUNELL CHARLESTON SHORTS, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 282nd District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court No. F12-60182

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this appeal, appellant, Boshunell Charleston Shorts, appears to challenge his

conviction from the 282nd Judicial District Court in Dallas County, Texas, arguing that

his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary due to his alleged incompetency. 1

1Appellant’s notice of appeal contains several deficiencies. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). However, because of our disposition and to expedite this decision, we will implement Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 and suspend Rule 25.2(d). See id. at R. 2. Because we lack jurisdiction over a judgment originating from a county outside our

district, we dismiss appellant’s appeal.2

Jurisdiction is fundamental and cannot be ignored. State v. Roberts, 940 S.W.2d

655, 657 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Our jurisdiction must be legally invoked. Lopez v. State,

114 S.W.3d 711, 714 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.) (citing Ex parte Caldwell,

383 S.W.2d 587, 589 (Tex. Crim. App. 1964)). If not legally invoked, our power to act is as

if it did not exist. Id. (citing Ex parte Caldwell, 383 S.W.2d at 589). When we lack

jurisdiction to act, we have no power to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner

other than dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1996).

Article 4.03 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides: “The Courts of Appeals

shall have appellate jurisdiction coextensive with the limits of their respective districts in

all criminal cases except those in which the death penalty has been assessed.” TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 4.03 (West 2015); see TEX. CONST. art. V, § 6(a). The Tenth Court of

Appeals District “is composed of the counties of Bosque, Burleson, Brazos, Coryell, Ellis,

Falls, Freestone, Hamilton, Hill, Johnson, Leon, Limestone, Madison, McLennan,

Navarro, Robertson, Somervell, and Walker.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.201(k) (West

2 A motion for rehearing may be filed within fifteen days after the judgment or order of this Court is rendered. TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by the Court of Criminal Appeals, a petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after either the day of the court of appeals' judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by the court of appeals. See id. at R. 68.2(a).

Shorts v. State Page 2 Supp. 2018). This Court is not vested with appellate jurisdiction over rulings from Dallas

County. See id.; see also TEX. CONST. art. V, § 6(a); TEX. CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 4.03.

Accordingly, we hereby dismiss appellant’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 4.03; see also TEX. CONST. art. V, § 6(a).

JOHN E. NEILL Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed March 6, 2019 Do not publish [CR25]

Shorts v. State Page 3