Boscovitz v. Cooper
This text of 50 P. 412 (Boscovitz v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
None of the evidence is contained in the record. The appellant contends that the pleadings do not support the judgment.
The replication is not a model of good pleading. Its averments as to the disposal of the bonds held as collateral se.curity for the payment of the note were somewhat indirect and ambiguous.’ No objection was made •to the replication, however, and it contained direct denials of all the affirmative averments of the answer, which fully sufficed to raise issues for trial. We are of the opinion that there is no merit in appellant’s contention that the pleadings do not support the judgment.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 P. 412, 20 Mont. 197, 1897 Mont. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boscovitz-v-cooper-mont-1897.