Bosco v. MacDonald, No. 094078 (Apr. 16, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Bosco v. MacDonald, No. 094078 (Apr. 16, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 2871

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided April 16, 1991·No. No. 094078·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (110.25) After hearing held on defendant-Lensink's motion, the court finds as follows:

Whether the defense of sovereign immunity does or does not bar suit against the defendant depends upon the status of J. Neale MacDonald Company, Inc., Antonio Pinheiro, and Interdome Group; i.e., whether they were staff members, employees, agents, or servants of the defendant-Lensink and therefore within the purview of 19a-24 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as the plaintiff alleges.

When it becomes apparent that a genuine issue of fact exists as to subject matter jurisdiction, the trial court must conduct an evidentiary hearing to insure the right of each party to present all relevant and material evidence for judicial resolution thereof. Kingsley v. International Co., 5 Conn. App. 76, 78-79 (1985).

The parties are ordered to take steps to assign the matter for an evidentiary hearing on the above described factual issue.

So ordered.

GAFFNEY, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (110.25) After hearing held on defendant-Lensink's motion, the court finds as follows:

Whether the defense of sovereign immunity does or does not bar suit against the defendant depends upon the status of J. Neale MacDonald Company, Inc., Antonio Pinheiro, and Interdome Group; i.e., whether they were staff members, employees, agents, or servants of the defendant-Lensink and therefore within the purview of 19a-24 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as the plaintiff alleges.

When it becomes apparent that a genuine issue of fact exists as to subject matter jurisdiction, the trial court must conduct an evidentiary hearing to insure the right of each party to present all relevant and material evidence for judicial resolution thereof. Kingsley v. International Co., 5 Conn. App. 76, 78-79 (1985).

The parties are ordered to take steps to assign the matter for an evidentiary hearing on the above described factual issue.

So ordered.

GAFFNEY, J.

Bosco v. MacDonald, No. 094078 (Apr. 16, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 2871 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 2871 (Bosco v. MacDonald, No. 094078 (Apr. 16, 1991)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related