Bosco v. Lindenhurst Public Schools

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bosco v. Lindenhurst Public Schools

267 A.D.2d 411, 700 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13317

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 411 (Bosco v. Lindenhurst Public Schools) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bosco v. Lindenhurst Public Schools, 267 A.D.2d 411, 700 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13317 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated January 27, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff allegedly sustained personal injuries when she fell in a parking lot owned and maintained by the defendant Lindenhurst Public Schools. Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, she failed to identify with sufficient particularity the location of her accident. Neither her testimony at the hearing pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h nor her examination before trial sufficiently clarified the location of her fall. Accordingly, the order is reversed, the defendant’s motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed (see, Yankana v City of New [412]*412York, 246 AD2d 645). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated January 27, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff allegedly sustained personal injuries when she fell in a parking lot owned and maintained by the defendant Lindenhurst Public Schools. Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, she failed to identify with sufficient particularity the location of her accident. Neither her testimony at the hearing pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h nor her examination before trial sufficiently clarified the location of her fall. Accordingly, the order is reversed, the defendant’s motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed (see, Yankana v City of New [412]*412York, 246 AD2d 645). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 411, 700 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bosco-v-lindenhurst-public-schools-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack